Unable to create an object of type 'BlogContext'. For the different patterns supported at design time, see

Hello all, When I try to access the Umbraco backoffice through my domain URL (e.g., "https://domain.com/umbraco"), I receive the following error: error: invalid_request error_description: The specified 'redirect_uri' is not valid for this client application. error_uri: https://documentation.openiddict.com/errors/ID2043 However, when I access the backoffice locally via "https://localhost/umbraco," it works perfectly without any issues. Could you explain why this is happening and how I can fix it?

I am trying to go into Settings > Examine in the backoffice, but there's something wrong with my Umbraco Forms Examine Index. Is there any way to resurrect this situation without resetting to a new installation? It would make me lose so many hours of work to not be able to continue with this setup. This is for local development. This is Umbraco CMS 13.4.1 and Umbraco Forms 13.2.1 The error I get is, also see the image:

System.IO.FileNotFoundException: Could not find file 'C:\Users\username\AppData\Local\Temp\ExamineIndexes\8fa855ceccf189764127bc5ada4f7b3c\UmbracoFormsRecordsIndex\_3x.fdx'.
File name: 'C:\Users\username\AppData\Local\Temp\ExamineIndexes\8fa855ceccf189764127bc5ada4f7b3c\UmbracoFormsRecordsIndex\_3x.fdx'
   at System.IO.FileInfo.get_Length()
   at Lucene.Net.Store.FSDirectory.FileLength(String name)
   at Lucene.Net.Replicator.IndexRevision.CreateRevisionFile(String fileName, Directory directory)
   at Lucene.Net.Replicator.IndexRevision.RevisionFiles(IndexCommit commit)
   at Lucene.Net.Replicator.IndexReplicationHandler..ctor(Directory indexDirectory, Action callback)
   at Examine.Lucene.ExamineReplicator..ctor(ILoggerFactory loggerFactory, LuceneIndex sourceIndex, Directory destinationDirectory, DirectoryInfo tempStorage)
   at Examine.Lucene.Directories.SyncedFileSystemDirectoryFactory.CreateDirectory(LuceneIndex luceneIndex, Boolean forceUnlock)
   at Examine.Lucene.Directories.DirectoryFactoryBase.<>c__DisplayClass2_0.
... // more log cutoff due to Discord

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1276462817029001236/1276462817184059454/image.png?ex=66c99e23&is=66c84ca3&hm=e55abd9bcfe4607d73a11d25ac43ab1b65048536b4c59afd0834122f1cbcd5c7&

Hi I have a controller/class where a method in this class is being called to get a page programmatically. As an example, in Umbraco 13 I have 2 pages. When I'm on page 2, I'm calling this method to get some details from page 1. I can get it by IContent (GetById) or some documents suggest using IPublishedContent. Which is the correct way to get this type of record? Thanks

When creating a doctype you get the options element type and composition, is there any difference under the hood? I am creating some compositions inside a migration so just wondering if there is anything else to consider. I've checked the database and both seem to be created the same just with a different default icon? Thanks ❤️

We have a website where the customer facing site (FE) and Umbraco (BE) run on different servers. We have Hangfire installed via Cultiv.Hangfire. Some jobs get scheduled from the FE and some from the BE. At the moment Hangfire seems to pick either server to run a job. My question, how can I tell Hangfire to only run jobs on one specific server, the BE one. Site is running 13.3.0 Also, great package @Sebastiaan

Hi, I have setup an U13 website and Im using Auth0 using the docs, and this example code: https://github.com/jbreuer/Umbraco-OpenIdConnect-Example, and it's mostly working great, I'm using this for Members only. I initially set it up with just one provider (Google) but I need to support multiple (over 10). The free testing account with Auth0 allows you to setup 2, so I've connected Google and Microsoft. I have autolinking setup so it creates a member in the Umbraco Backoffice, this is great. So the scenario: A user logins in using their Google account and it creates their account with the name: user@website.com they get logged in, and everything is good. They log out and try to login with Microsoft account (which also uses user@website.com) everything goes through the right steps but when I land back at my umbraco instance I am present with this error:

Cannot insert duplicate key row in object 'dbo.umbracoExternalLogin' with unique index 'IX_umbracoExternalLogin_LoginProvider'. The duplicate key value is (UmbracoMembers.OpenIdConnect, *{{insert memeber's guid here}}*). The statement has been terminated.

I need the system to create different members for each social login, does anyone have any advice on how to do this, a link to a blog about it, or a link to documentation? Thanks in advanced.

Hey, I've recently upgraded one of our clients sites from umbraco 8.13.1 all the way to 13.0.1 - after some struggling I've managed to sort it out. BUT I've recently discovered that when I log into the backoffice I keep getting "Session timed out." not even 60 seconds after I've logged in. I've tried setting up the TimeOut value in appsettings.json to a multiple different values without any success. I've scoured the internet and I cannot find anything that seems to resolve this issue for me. Is there anyone who've encountered this problem and if so how did you resolve it?

Hi all I have setup two sites under one Umbraco 13. I can get to one site but not the other so I setup the culture and host as below Site 1 - http://localhost:1234 Site 2 - http://localhost:1234/siteTwo This works and I'm able to get to the second site. Is the only way to have these working for two separate domains is if I had two domains as Site 1 - http://domainOne Site 1 - http://domaintwo Is by setting up IIS on my machine? So I can't do this using IIS express (that comes with Visual Studio)?

I am currently trying to load vtt files for video subtitles from umbraco media section in our frontend. We use an NextJs Frontend, so the domain of the frontend is not the same as the Umbraco instance. I now get cors errors when i try to load the vtt files. the images and videos are loaded without a problem. Did anyone else have the same problem?