Exceeding 260 character limit for paths in Windows

Hi, I'm Umbraco newbie and I'm trying to use property alias in a block list but with no luck. I have no idea what I'm doing wrong. I keep getting {{newProperty}} instead of it's value ☹️ https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1251236913310863504/1251236914007248996/image.png?ex=666dd8af&is=666c872f&hm=b6755363efe83874d763a9f6a0f56da8fdac9061344b420dc8917ec4d0fa7537& https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1251236913310863504/1251236914292457533/image.png?ex=666dd8af&is=666c872f&hm=2b3c11b913f0ab56d506911eb440b81566f9e99457ed8e93d32d3cbd4f5f1297& https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1251236913310863504/1251236914703372348/image.png?ex=666dd8af&is=666c872f&hm=7216296ce319d1a92e65f1b8a6686ca48402264d8598c8a1a9bbc32fc08758d2&

First a few words about our setup: We are using the latest version of Umbraco v12.2.0 with Flexible Load Balancing on Docker containers running Ubuntu Linux. We are having currently one publisher (Backoffice) and one subscriber (front-end). We went with headless approach using Umbraco Content Delivery API. For media we are using S3. API content is served through Kestrel inside front-end docker container. Both containers (subscriber and publisher) are using the same instance of Sql Server. Installed packages in Umbraco: - Umbraco Workflow v12.1.1 - uSync v12.1.0 In the Backoffice we have currently two sites, with up to 15 sub-pages on each. We also used multilingual setup, each page has content for two languages. Every page consists of a few blocks on block grid. The size of the DB is around 190MB (so nothing huge in any case). Our issue (this can be reproduced on each docker containers restart): I just focues on the front-end/subscriber container here. The same can be also noticed on the Backoffice container (publisher). When front-end (subscriber) docker container starts, it uses around 160MB of memory looking at docker stats. Right after the first request is made to the front-end, memory jumps to around 280MB. About half a minute from the first request, memory jumps again to around 1,7GB. At the time of the big memory jump (from 280MB -> 1,7GB) I see bunch of messages in logs like: DeliveryApiContentIndex Write lucene doc id:{id}|{languageCode}, category:{category}, type:{type} So I would say the Examine index is the cause of the high memory consumption. I also verified Examine indexes in the publisher Backoffice (can't access front-end because Backoffice is disabled): - DeliveryApiContentIndex: DocumentCount=146, FieldCount=22 - ExternalIndex: DocumentCount=284, FieldCount=849 - InternalIndex: DocumentCount=297, FieldCount=1054 - MemberIndex: DocumentCount=0, FieldCount=0 Is maybe someone else also noticing high memory consumption?

I updated an Umbraco site from v12.2 to v13.5.1 On my local machine everything works like it should. I published the database and the projectname.dll to my server and I restarted the app pool and site in IIS and I get the "HTTP Error 500.30 - ASP.NET Core app failed to start". There's nothing in the Umbraco logs. I turned on stdout in the web.config and nothing is produced there. Note: in my server's Event Viewer I see "hit unexpected managed exception, exception code = '0xe0434352'. Please check the stderr logs for more information."

I have my connection string and container name set. However with the following in a Composer

builder.AddAzureBlobFileSystem(AzureBlobFileSystemOptions.MediaFileSystemName)
   .AddAzureBlobImageSharpCache();

I get a VirtualPath is required error OptionsValidationException: DataAnnotation validation failed for 'AzureBlobFileSystemOptions' members: 'VirtualPath' with the error: 'The VirtualPath field is required.'. Microsoft.Extensions.Options.OptionsFactory.Create(string name) System.Lazy.ViaFactory(LazyThreadSafetyMode mode) System.Lazy.ExecutionAndPublication(LazyHelper executionAndPublication, bool useDefaultConstructor) System.Lazy.CreateValue() Microsoft.Extensions.Options.OptionsCache.GetOrAdd(string name, Func createOptions, TArg factoryArgument) Microsoft.Extensions.Options.OptionsMonitor.Get(string name) Umbraco.StorageProviders.AzureBlob.ImageSharp.AzureBlobFileSystemImageCache..ctor(IOptionsMonitor options, string name, string containerRootPath) Umbraco.Cms.Core.DependencyInjection.AddAzureBlobImageSharpCacheExtensions+<>c__DisplayClass3_0.b__0(IServiceProvider provider)

My team and I have attempted an umbraco upgrade to the latest stable 13.x.x on a production environment (at the time of work sign-off). We maintain three deployment environments for our client: - An internal test and a prep-prod/UAT environment. - Production All of these umbraco applications are hosted in Azure in the form of Azure Web Apps. Pre-Prod and Prod are the closes architecturally speaking as each have two app web apps: 1) An Administrative instance for the umbraco backoffice 2) A public facing instance of the website An upgrade on all environments prior to production has been relatively painless - allowing Umbraco to applicate the necessary changes to facilitate the upgrade to 13.0.3. Unfortunately, the same can be said about production: The production database contains significantly more content that that of the non-prod environments and could be a contributing factor to the SQL timeout exceptions observed in the installation splash screen and in the trace logs *Troubleshooting * There was two key issues that we resolved together on pre-prod: Ensuring that the .NET stack version on the Azure Web app was updated to v8 (which I did) Adding and increasing the **DistributedLockingReadLockDefaultTimeOut **values in the appsettings. I also came across one example of the issues with an Umbraco 13 upgrade as described in this Umbraco forms thread. The suggested remediation steps didn’t resolve my issue. If you have any ideas for next steps, I’d be appreciative. https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1219659453012639856/1219659453155250196/fe0d208e-9f4d-4ae2-99b5-28a59d8d9fa0.png?ex=660c1b61&is=65f9a661&hm=a1dbe9908a72a51961dcb7b998f104e523489b853719e20c37f0b78a8229f598&

I want to see Umbraco application's logs in Application Insights. I'm using the following packages: Azure.Monitor.OpenTelemetry.AspNetCore Serilog.Sinks.OpenTelemetry

builder.Services.AddOpenTelemetry().UseAzureMonitor()

The issue is with the app inights Serilog Sink I am loosing a lot of telemetry and I have my whole setup built arounf OTEL standards and OTEL exporters, which Azure monitor provides, and with Serilog I think it kills all exporters, On my custom dotnet application I used Serilog flag

writeToProviders

so I'd have both logger in action, but for Umbraco I do not know what is the best way to do so

services.AddSerilog((loggerConfiguration) =>
 {
     loggerConfiguration.MinimalConfiguration(configuration)
                        .ReadFrom.Configuration(configuration);
 }, writeToProviders: true);

We've got a problem that the images are not displaying in the frontend but are available in the backoffice so the file is there and you can view it. In the console there is the following error. An unhandled exception has occurred while executing the request. SixLabors.ImageSharp.UnknownImageFormatException: Image cannot be loaded. Available decoders: - TIFF : TiffDecoder - BMP : BmpDecoder - TGA : TgaDecoder - QOI : QoiDecoder - GIF : GifDecoder - PBM : PbmDecoder - Webp : WebpDecoder - JPEG : JpegDecoder - PNG : PngDecoder I think it has something todo with the cache because we usynced these images from staging to localhost

Has anyone seen static file redirects not triggering with SkyBrud? Working on a site that has been migrated to v13 (originally v7 => v8, now v13). Skyrbud was installed back in the v8 days and has a large amount of redirects in it, however all of the ones that seem to be for static files / media items (i.e. end in a file extension) are not triggering, If the file extension is removed in the redirect rule and from the requested URL they trigger. I'm not really sure where to start my investigation with this, so looking for some pointers.

I'm currently using the newest beta version of Examine to use faceting in an Umbraco13 site. After adding a new language (added Dutch to the already existing English) I get the error: 'field "$facets" was not indexed with SortedSetDocValues' Is anyone familiair with this? It seems to be something going on withing Examine since I do not specify a field called '$facets"