Our website is ready to go live, but I think I may have accidently moved web.config file to a different folder. Should the web.config file be located in the wwwroot folder? I added the following rewrite in the web.config file, it did not redirect to my custom hostname. I replaced https://www.example.com to my hostname. The hostname starts with account not www.

<rewrite>
                <rules>
                    <rule name="Redirect umbraco.io to primary hostname" stopProcessing="true">
                        <match url=".*" />
                        <conditions>
                            <add input="{HTTP_HOST}" pattern="\.umbraco\.io$" />
                            <add input="{HTTP_HOST}" pattern="^(dev-|stage-)(.*)?\.umbraco\.io$" ignoreCase="true" negate="true" />
                            <add input="{REQUEST_URI}" pattern="^/umbraco" ignoreCase="true" negate="true" />
                            <add input="{REQUEST_URI}" pattern="^/App_Plugins" ignoreCase="true" negate="true" />
                            <add input="{REQUEST_URI}" pattern="^/sb" negate="true" />
                            <!-- Don't redirect Smidge Bundle -->
                            <add input="{HTTP_COOKIE}" pattern="^(.+; )?UMB_UCONTEXT=([^;]*)(;.+)?$" negate="true" />
                            <!-- Ensure preview can render -->
                            <add input="{HTTP_HOST}" pattern="^localhost(:[0-9]+)?$" negate="true" />
                        </conditions>
                        <action type="Redirect" url="https://www.example.com/{R:0}" redirectType="Permanent" />
                    </rule>
                </rules>
            </rewrite>

Hi im trying to setup my SMTP settings to no avail just yet. I have set up a sendgrid api key and have changed my appsettings to look like:

"Smtp": {
        "From": "__myemail__",
        "Host": "smtp.sendgrid.net",
        "Username": "apikey",
        "Password": "__sendgridapikey__"
      }

when I trigger an umbraco form workflow to send the email it returns with these logs [16:26:05 INF] Form Entry Submitted - Form Entry Id: 9ca4f052-821b-44a6-a07c-7c176d9440b6, Form Id: d601e99a-8932-4d39-9396-62285cab8651, User: [16:26:05 ERR] Core email service reports that email message cannot be sent. [16:26:05 INF] Form Entry Approved - Form Entry Id: 9ca4f052-821b-44a6-a07c-7c176d9440b6, Form Id: d601e99a-8932-4d39-9396-62285cab8651, User: if someone could help me out it would be greatly appreciated 🙏

Is there documentation or any good articles for Upgrading from v10 to v13? Do I need to go through 11 and 12 first? I have already run into this error going from 10 to 11:

Error during installation
The database failed to upgrade. ERROR: The database configuration failed with the following message: The migration plan does not support migrating from state "{83AF7945-DADE-4A02-9041-F3F6EBFAC319}".

Since I got a new laptop, the backoffice in Umbraco on localhost has really bad performance. The website on the frontend is super fast, however if there are images that are fetched from an api (for example a custom controller to get the right crop), those are also loaded slow, like the backoffice. My guess is that there is something wrong with my SQL Server (developer edition) setup or similar configuration on my laptop. The weird thing is that the exact same setup worked perfectly fine on my old laptop. Both laptops got Windows 11, and the same version of software installed to make localhost work. My localhost project is using Umbraco 10.8.8, and is a clone of a Cloud project. When I access the backoffice, most of the times I need to wait for about 30 seconds to show to content tree. I checked the network tab, and saw that the "/umbraco/backoffice/umbracotrees/applicationtree/GetApplicationTrees?application=content&tree=&use=main" call is stuck waiting for server response for more than 25 seconds. However this is completely random. Sometimes the backoffice just needs 3 seconds to load. This randomness got me to think there is some kind of scheduled task working in the background that slows the performance or locks the database, but I disabled all of the (custom) scheduled tasks of the project, so this can't be it. If it was only the content tree in the backoffice that loads for 30 seconds, I could live with it, but there is more. Often when I access the media or settings tab in the backoffice, it keeps loading and eventually giving me timeouts. I tried to delete the TEMP folder, and rebuilding the indexers. Most of the times when rebuilding the indexers it gives me a timeout, and it didn't complete. What I also tried was firing up a complete different project in Visual Studio, and experimenting if the backoffice is also slow in other projects, but it seemed to be loading fast. So on the one hand there could be something wrong with my project, or my configuration https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1344605280281038849/1344605280540819486/Timeout-populating-indexers.png?ex=67c184c0&is=67c03340&hm=f25a04a3a145bc9819ef42a46e26d77d99b22fcc802fdfb46744dc2a954d7b1a&

Recently upgraded to v13.0.0 RC3 on .net 8 - Even though NuGet showed that I had Contentment installed, I could no longer see the Contentment data types, so I reinstalled & updated Contentment to v4.5.1 - after upgrading I got the following

Method 'ToArtifact' in type 'Umbraco.Community.Contentment.DataEditors.EditorNotesConfigurationConnector' from assembly 'Umbraco.Community.Contentment, Version=4.5.1.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null' does not have an implementation.
Method 'ToArtifact' in type 'Umbraco.Community.Contentment.DataEditors.NotesConfigurationConnector' from assembly 'Umbraco.Community.Contentment, Version=4.5.1.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null' does not have an implementation.
Method 'ToArtifact' in type 'Umbraco.Community.Contentment.DataEditors.RenderMacroConfigurationConnector' from assembly 'Umbraco.Community.Contentment, Version=4.5.1.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null' does not have an implementation.

@leekelleher - I see on github that you supporting v13 & v8! 🙌 😁 Do I need to update to Contentment 4.6.0? I am happy to, just don't see it in NuGet quite yet (even with "Include prerelease" selected) If it's not an upgrade issue, does anything jump out to you? FWIW this was a v12 to v13 upgrade. Possible that it's just because I'm on a RC these are expected wrinkles? Thanks, -Roger

V13.4.1 I have a single column layout block which has a settings model which happily changes the background colour on the front end web site. However, when attempting to set up a preview, I get the data out ok, but I have no idea how to get the settings data to apply. I tried using the old V11 example site but couldn't really convert it as I didn't understand what the syntax was in the Angular. Does anyone have a simple example of getting a settings model to output to a preview html? Thanks.

Heyo, I'm currently experiencing an unexpected error with my local Umbraco Commerce instance. It was all working as expected then suddenly started throwing this error on a successful transaction. The order completes correctly, but it doesn't take me to the confirmation page. I'm using both the Stripe and Checkout packages, although the checkout is a copy of the source, rather than the nuget due to needing some additional functionality. The error appears to be coming from Umbraco Commerce itself, but i'm not sure why. I did accidently restart the site midway through a transaction so I wonder if somethings gone funky in the db? This is all is get form the error message

System.Data.DBConcurrencyException: A Concurrency update occurred in table 'umbracoCommerceOrder' for primary key value(s) = 'a28b060c-6bed-4ab9-a433-019002723487' and version = '11'
   at Umbraco.Commerce.Infrastructure.Resiliency.PollyExecutionStrategyBase.ExecuteAsync[TResult](Func`2 operation, Func`2 verifySucceeded, CancellationToken cancellationToken)
   at Umbraco.Commerce.Core.UmbracoCommerceUnitOfWorkProvider.ExecuteAsync[T](IUnitOfWorkOptions options, Func`3 action, CancellationToken cancellationToken)
   at Umbraco.Commerce.Cms.Web.Controllers.UmbracoCommercePaymentController.CallbackWithRetry(IPaymentProvider paymentProvider, PaymentProviderContext ctx, Int32 retryCount, Int32 maxRetries)

Any assistance would be greatly appreciated. This is on Umbraco 13.3.2 and Umbraco Commerce 13.1.4.

Hi everyone, I'm currently working with Umbraco 10.8.6 and Umbraco Forms 10.5.4, with my media stored on Azure Blob Storage. I have a contact form that includes a File Upload field where users can attach a file. My goal is to scan the file's contents using my existing method, ScanFile()—which takes a Stream representing the file content—before the file is saved in the system to ensure it doesn’t contain any malicious software. I've tried a few approaches so far: 1. I attempted to add a custom workflow to validate the file. However, it seems that by the time the workflow runs, the file is already saved in a temporary folder on Azure Blob. 2. I also tried using the MediaSavingNotification, but it appears that Umbraco Forms bypasses this notification when a file is uploaded via the form. 3. Additionally, I experimented with something like a FormValidateNotification. In that case, I had access to all the values from the submitted form. However, the file upload field's value appears as a 260-character string that doesn’t contain the file's content; it ends with the attached file's name. I'm not sure what this string represents, and I couldn’t find any documentation about it. Another idea I had was to add middleware to intercept the HTTP request after the form is submitted. However, that approach feels clunky, and I'm convinced there must be a better way. Has anyone faced a similar issue or have suggestions on the best approach to scan the file before it is saved? Perhaps there are even better methods that I haven’t considered. Thanks in advance for your help!

One of our clients wants to use their SSO on their Umbraco Cloud website. This is working locally, and I can see both the Umbraco ID and their SSO buttons on the normal Umbraco login screen, how can I change Umbraco Cloud to disable the login page redirect and show the standard Umbraco login form?

Hi all, I've got an issue where non-admin users are getting logged out when trying to submit/edit certain grid content. Slightly strange one as I can't recreate the issue with an Admin account, so it seems it might be a permissions issue? I'm getting this 'Could not validate XSRF token' error in the logs with non-admin users: ``System.Web.Mvc.HttpAntiForgeryException (0x80004005): The provided anti-forgery token was meant for a different claims-based user than the current user. at System.Web.Helpers.AntiXsrf.TokenValidator.ValidateTokens(HttpContextBase httpContext, IIdentity identity, AntiForgeryToken sessionToken, AntiForgeryToken fieldToken) at System.Web.Helpers.AntiXsrf.AntiForgeryWorker.Validate(HttpContextBase httpContext, String cookieToken, String formToken) at Umbraco.Web.WebApi.Filters.AngularAntiForgeryHelper.ValidateTokens(String cookieToken, String headerToken)`` Has anyone come across this before? Thanks, Simon