We have a valid uSync complete company license that we use for our clients. On a v8 project, we use uSync complete on their servers. They have a DEV, TEST, ACC and PROD server. The uSync configuration is in the deploy pipeline of GIT and hasn't changed since 2022. It has always worked since then. Since beginning of december 2024 the client isn't able to publish content on TEST (pushing content). I checked it myself: - I can publish from ACC to PROD - I can publish from DEV to TEST - But I am not able to publish from TEST to either DEV or ACC While going over the uSync publisher settings in the backoffice on TEST, I can check the access to the configured servers. DEV and ACC are listed as available. So there doesn't seems to be an access issue. Publishing existing content to another server doesn't work. However, we found a work around. There is still a error message, but new content does get published. Deleting content on another server makes it "new". The Umbraco logs don't provide us much to go on. Remote Error: InternalServerError (/umbraco/uSyncReceive/uSyncReceiveApi/ImportPackFolder) Content: [] at uSync.Publisher.Publishers.SyncPublisherBase.d__12.MoveNext() The "servers" are Azure app services and don't provide more information.

I am trying to integrate external login using OpenID Connect and using organization's custom authentication server. I have tried using the OpenID authentication process and configure it. I am getting token then again showing login page with management authorize url. after successfully login and get token from the auth server it redirect to this URL: https://localhost:44350/umbraco/login?ReturnUrl=%2Fumbraco%2Fmanagement%2Fapi%2Fv1%2Fsecurity%2Fback-office%2Fauthorize%3Fredirect_uri%3Dhttps%253A%252F%252Flocalhost%253A44350%252Fumbraco%252Foauth_complete%26client_id%3Dumbraco-back-office%26response_type%3Dcode%26state%3DINSmcJ0iFJ%26scope%3Doffline_access%26prompt%3Dconsent%26access_type%3Doffline%26identity_provider%3DUmbraco.OpenIdConnect%26code_challenge%3Dg69bnBIy_w55RgbiIHnRrCqP7TnZ0cy1-QOkRn1WMx4%26code_challenge_method%3DS256 do you have any idea why this is happened? Thank you.

I am using SeoToolKit and Umb v13. I have a multi-site setup where staff bios are being shared. I created a shell page that gets the staff member data from an ID on the route. The issue I keep running into is that the SeoToolKit is throwing missing object errors when loading. When I remove the tag helpers, the page will load fine. I am wondering if there is someone who knows the SeoToolKit package better and can tell me how to populate SEO tags from the Umbraco Page Controller.

Recently purchased a Lenovo Carbon x1 12th gen with the OLED display. The adaptive brightness/OLED protection dims the taskbar/background apps. However, it also kicks in whilst watching videos/on MS teams video calls and dims the video presumably as the presence detection can't distinguish between me being idle, over engaged in watching a video. I konw I can just turn all the adaptive brightness off.. but that seems a little sledgehammer and looses the burn in protection for the OLED display.... Just wondered if anyone else might have the same issues.. (lenovo premium support are telling me I'm the only one!)

Hi, we’ve been doing some research trying to establish what is the best way to proceed with frontend builds with Umbraco at the moment. Just wondering what everyone else is up to? The way we see it, there is the traditional method of building HTML/CSS/JS templates (and any static frameworks etc) and then transforming into cshtml. Or the headless approach of using SPA frameworks React/Next etc – and then requesting the data via an API. Naturally the SPA frameworks are great for when there’s a lot of interaction, just thinking if they’re overkill for brochure-wear sites that are SEO dependant. Has anyone come across of merging the two approaches?

With the

tryExecuteAndNotify

helper from Umbraco to help me calling my OpenAPI Spec from my generated TS client. I am trying to return a nice message from my C# Mgmt API Controller in the hope that it gets shown in the error notification but I just get

ApiError
A fatal server error occurred. If this continues, please reach out to your administrator.

I'm trying to install the new v14-preview 2 and I'm getting this error when building. Any ideas?

Is there a way to make the "Submit message / Go to page" default workflow optional? This article is great for explaining how to add a custom workflow - https://docs.umbraco.com/umbraco-forms/v/10.forms.latest/developer/extending/customize-default-workflows You can mark the custom workflow as

IsMandatory = false

but I can't find anyway to change the order/disable the "Submit message / Go to page" workflow.

A generic question. If you have Azure webapp set to scale out. Say 2 - 4 instances. If I do a deployment from VS to a slot and then swap - how does this work with the multiple instances.

Anybody ever tried creating Umbraco Forms programmatically ? This should be possible, but the docs are lacking on this topic.