How would people feel about depending on
# package-development
w
How would people feel about depending on Umbraco HQ AuthorizedService package to help/handle the Auth? For example Auth against say Google/Youtube for a prop editor?!
c
Can't say I've used it, but I remember bookmarking it to look at later a year or so ago, but it doesn't look actively maintained?
s
I would prefer if it did
w
Yep that’s the one Carl
Yeh how would you let people know it depends on this. Shall I get them to install it themselves so it’s really explicit or do I do it as a nuget dependency and this other thing gets magically installed for them
j
I'd say if it's required for your package to work then it should be a dependency. It does put a bit more work on you though to ensure compatibility with version upgrades over time
s
I'm using it all the time, it's great! It's actively maintained. Just doesn't need a lot of maintenance.
Don't reinvent the wheel, I'd say! Too much work to put all that plumbing in your package if someone else already did all the hard work for you!
w
Yeh thats my thinking Seb. OK will go for that approach and try something small out first
c
Nice - good to know - thanks Seb 🙂
b
@Warren Buckley as long you flag it I am fine with it, I just dont like depending on reviewing nuget depedency tree 🙂
r
Maybe add it to the core? I also think it's great just don't like dependencies on other packages..
s
It's not something that most people need, and updating a single package is a lot easier than updating core functionality for all supported major versions of Umbraco.
7 Views