We have suffered from this issue before when setting up a new project on Azure. Old thread: https://discord.com/channels/869656431308189746/1183873525031911554 Now, we are seeing this issue on local development on localhost:8080 on a project where we're upgrading from Umbraco 10 to 13. After logging into the CMS, there is about a 40-60 second wait. Then there is a call to

/umbraco/backoffice/umbracoapi/authentication/GetRemainingTimeoutSeconds

that returns:

)]}',
0.0

Upon which the user is logged out showing message "Session timed out." We have tried using incognito mode to rule out cookies, as well as completely fresh browser profile in Chrome. Are we missing something completely basic for this problem to occur? appsetting Umbraco.CMS.Global.TimeOut is set to

08:00:00

. 8 hours is more than 1 minute. We have not supplied any other setting that should affect this. In our previous 'fresh' project the settings were also default. Umbraco.CMS.Security.KeepUserLoggedIn is not set to

true

thus it should be interpreted as the default

false

. > When set to false a user will be logged out after a specific amount of time has passed with no activity. You can specify this time span in the global settings with the TimeOut key. This is exactly what we've done. Umbraco.CMS.Security.AllowConcurrentLogins is showing a bit of a strange behavior. We don't have this defined at all. But setting it to true, and then restarting Umbraco, and then simply reloading the browser window of the recently auto-logged out user in a fresh browser profile will automatically log them in and show the backoffice. Logging out above mentioned user and then logging in seems to work fine as well.

GetRemainingTimeoutSeconds

returns the full 8 hours. However, logging out, setting

AllowConcurrentLogins

to false again and then logging back in, the problem reappears. In our tests, this is the only browser window using the site. Why are we seeing this problem?

Hi, I have an Umbraco 11 site that uses Nested Content (it was originally a v8 site) and I want to update it to use the BlockList editor. The problem I have is that Nested Content is used quite extensively throughout the site for live content. I was thinking of changing my editors to BlockList, then using a SendingContentNotification handler to convert the property value in the CMS. That would be fine for content editors, and the actual value (which is still Nested Content at this point) would be updated to BlockList on the next save. But what about on the front-end, I'd have to handle both scenarios - one where the content is a BlockList, and one where the content is still in the old Nested Content format? It just doesn't feel right. Has anyone gone through this already?

We have a requirement to allow very large file sizes (2GB) be uploaded through Umbraco Forms. I've set the MaxRequestBodySize to 2147483648 I've set the maxAllowedContentLength to 2147483648 I can upload a 350mb file fine but trying to upload a 650mb file the form submits fine (no errors) but files are not included in the email or form entry. The 650mb file uploads fine through the Media Manager. Anybody know what else I might be missing? Am testing with .mp4 and .zip - they're not disallowed file types and I've even tried specifying them in the allowed form list. Umbraco 13.3.0 Umbraco Forms 13.1.2 IIS Also using FormKit if that's causing an issue (haven't ruled that out yet).

I think I'm getting myself in a pickle here!! I have an U8 site with DTGE grid content. I've installed uSync Packer, and created a zip file from the backoffice (I have to manually add my content configs to the zip as their missing) In the V13 site, I've installed uSync Migrations and uploaded the zip file. I can see the migration in the Existing Migrations list, Site Files is ticked, BUT Converted is not. Do I "need" to convert the files, I thought that using V8 usync files, meant that I didn't need to convert them? I have tried converting, and then running an uSync Import, but this doesn't seem to work very well. I don't see any Grid Layouts or Row configs, and when I try to load the front end I get a "item with the same key has already been added" error from the internal Umbraco BlockGridPropertyValueConverter

Hey, Appreciate the fantastic uSync migrations project I've inherited a v8 project that has a custom implementation of a Nested Content datatype. From what I can tell there's not much difference to the original Nested Content datatype, but I don't know the history of the project. I've recreated the DocType with a standard Nested Content DataType so I can see how the data is different in preparation to use uSync migrations. The data structure is the same it seems, but new lines are handled differently. Custom Nested Content

<layout>
      <Value><![CDATA[[
  {
    "key": "f0a8df2b-f1f4-4a80-9c16-2b70a52216ae",
    "name": "Standard",
    "ncContentTypeAlias": "standard",
    "pageHeader": [
      {
        "key": "d7774230-5a6c-4415-b0e0-88193b4a379f",
        "name": "Hero",
        "ncContentTypeAlias": "hero",
        "title": "Hero Title Custom Nested Content",
        "subTitle": "Hero subTitle Custom Nested Content",
        "component": []
      }
    ],
    "display": [
      {
        "key": "c172bc9a-14e8-4a78-8567-7a4375bdf469",
        "name": "Html",
        "ncContentTypeAlias": "html",
        "text": "<p>Custom display</p>"
      }
    ]
  }
]]]></Value>
    </layout>

Standard Nested Content

<layout13>
      <Value><![CDATA[[
  {
    "key": "d2327547-8933-4803-ac84-a9c769326c60",
    "name": "Standard",
    "ncContentTypeAlias": "standard",
    "pageHeader": "[\r\n  {\r\n    \"key\": \"21275e98-78c6-4563-933f-4389bfeef470\",\r\n    \"name\": \"Hero\",\r\n    \"ncContentTypeAlias\": \"hero\",\r\n    \"title\": \"Hero Title Standard Nested Content\",\r\n    \"subTitle\": \"Hero subTitle Standard Nested Content\",\r\n    \"component\": []\r\n  }\r\n]",
    "display": "[\r\n  {\r\n    \"key\": \"e073dbe0-9d90-40e7-be69-a4a0141fe236\",\r\n    \"name\": \"Html\",\r\n    \"ncContentTypeAlias\": \"html\",\r\n    \"text\": \"<p>Standard display</p>\"\r\n  }\r\n]"
  }
]]]></Value>
    </layout13>

tbc.

In our V8 we have some custom conif in tinyMceConfig.config:

<!-- this area is for custom config settings that should be added during TinyMCE initialization -->
    <customConfig>
        <!--    <config key="myKey">mySetting</config>-->
        <config key="entity_encoding">raw</config>
          <config key="style_formats">
            [
            {"title":"Headers","items":[{"title":"Header 2 (H2)","block":"h2"},{"title":"Header 3 (H3)","block":"h3"}]},
            {"title":"Languages","items":[{"title":"English","inline":"span", "attributes":{"lang":"en"}},{"title":"Japanese","inline":"span", "attributes":{"lang":"ja"}},{"title":"Chinese","inline":"span", "attributes":{"lang":"zh-Hans"}}]}
            ]
          </config>
    </customConfig>

I understand this is now done in appsettings.json Are there any tutorials or examples where I can achieve the same result?

We've got Umbraco hosted in Azure, in a load-balanced environment with deployment slots. We're seeing a lot of warnings in the logs. Umbraco Version 13.0.1 W : Error unprotecting the session cookie. Stack Trace : System.Security.Cryptography.CryptographicException: The key {078a31d2-3d8c-4b43-baeb-a639524b05c5} was not found in the key ring. For more information go to https://aka.ms/aspnet/dataprotectionwarning at Microsoft.AspNetCore.DataProtection.KeyManagement.KeyRingBasedDataProtector.UnprotectCore(Byte[] protectedData, Boolean allowOperationsOnRevokedKeys, UnprotectStatus& status) at Microsoft.AspNetCore.DataProtection.KeyManagement.KeyRingBasedDataProtector.Unprotect(Byte[] protectedData) at Microsoft.AspNetCore.Session.CookieProtection.Unprotect(IDataProtector protector, String protectedText, ILogger logger) We also see a rare instance of an error, but this seems much less frequent Microsoft.AspNetCore.Antiforgery.AntiforgeryValidationException: The antiforgery token could not be decrypted. Stacktrace : System.Security.Cryptography.CryptographicException: The key {84cea658-5bcd-439a-b175-d1c4bb7956f7} was not found in the key ring. For more information go to https://aka.ms/aspnet/dataprotectionwarning at Microsoft.AspNetCore.DataProtection.KeyManagement.KeyRingBasedDataProtector.UnprotectCore(Byte[] protectedData, Boolean allowOperationsOnRevokedKeys, UnprotectStatus& status) at Microsoft.AspNetCore.DataProtection.KeyManagement.KeyRingBasedDataProtector.Unprotect(Byte[] protectedData) at Microsoft.AspNetCore.Antiforgery.DefaultAntiforgeryTokenSerializer.Deserialize(String serializedToken) --- End of inner exception stack trace --- at Microsoft.AspNetCore.Antiforgery.DefaultAntiforgeryTokenSerializer.Deserialize(String serializedToken) at Microsoft.AspNetCore.Antiforgery.DefaultAntiforgery.GetCookieTokenDoesNotThrow(HttpContext httpContext) Anyone seen this issue, or similar?

Trying to understand the use cases for block grids and block lists

Hello all. I have an issue I have been trying to track down off and on for a couple days. Recently upgraded from 13.2.1 to 13.2.2. Running vanilla Umbraco; no code modifications, use SQL Server back end. I can run it locally pointing at a SQL server at my web host company and it works fine. When I do a web deploy, I get the message: Unhandled exception. System.InvalidOperationException: The factory has not been configured with a proper connection string. at Umbraco.Cms.Infrastructure.Persistence.UmbracoDatabaseFactory.Initialize()... I can connect directly to the SQL server using the exact same connection string info as well, so I know the connection string is correct. I've obfuscated the connecting string below, but here it is. Again, when I run the code locally on my machine, it works fine connecting to this server. "umbracoDbDSN": "Data Source=tcp:s23.winhost.com;Initial Catalog=########;User ID=#######r;Password=#######;Integrated Security=False;TrustServerCertificate=true;", What am I missing? Is something cached on the web host's server? I have completely deleted everything off the server (via FTP) and redeployed, but the same error persists. I appreciate any and every bit of help anyone can provide.

V13.1.1 I've tried : @Model.Content.OverlayText?.ReplaceLineEndings() but it's still all in one line. This is what the input looks like (below). I've tried soft line endings and hard, both the same. I'd rather not change the control over to an RTE if I can get away with it. Any advice appreciated. Thanks. https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1212812728817680384/1212812729077862441/image.png?ex=65f332df&is=65e0bddf&hm=f6492e7fcb29c69d372317d4d96c58e523aac399e28422178b7b2be68cf3128a&