Hello all. I have an issue I have been trying to track down off and on for a couple days. Recently upgraded from 13.2.1 to 13.2.2. Running vanilla Umbraco; no code modifications, use SQL Server back end. I can run it locally pointing at a SQL server at my web host company and it works fine. When I do a web deploy, I get the message: Unhandled exception. System.InvalidOperationException: The factory has not been configured with a proper connection string. at Umbraco.Cms.Infrastructure.Persistence.UmbracoDatabaseFactory.Initialize()... I can connect directly to the SQL server using the exact same connection string info as well, so I know the connection string is correct. I've obfuscated the connecting string below, but here it is. Again, when I run the code locally on my machine, it works fine connecting to this server. "umbracoDbDSN": "Data Source=tcp:s23.winhost.com;Initial Catalog=########;User ID=#######r;Password=#######;Integrated Security=False;TrustServerCertificate=true;", What am I missing? Is something cached on the web host's server? I have completely deleted everything off the server (via FTP) and redeployed, but the same error persists. I appreciate any and every bit of help anyone can provide.

We've got Umbraco hosted in Azure, in a load-balanced environment with deployment slots. We're seeing a lot of warnings in the logs. Umbraco Version 13.0.1 W : Error unprotecting the session cookie. Stack Trace : System.Security.Cryptography.CryptographicException: The key {078a31d2-3d8c-4b43-baeb-a639524b05c5} was not found in the key ring. For more information go to https://aka.ms/aspnet/dataprotectionwarning at Microsoft.AspNetCore.DataProtection.KeyManagement.KeyRingBasedDataProtector.UnprotectCore(Byte[] protectedData, Boolean allowOperationsOnRevokedKeys, UnprotectStatus& status) at Microsoft.AspNetCore.DataProtection.KeyManagement.KeyRingBasedDataProtector.Unprotect(Byte[] protectedData) at Microsoft.AspNetCore.Session.CookieProtection.Unprotect(IDataProtector protector, String protectedText, ILogger logger) We also see a rare instance of an error, but this seems much less frequent Microsoft.AspNetCore.Antiforgery.AntiforgeryValidationException: The antiforgery token could not be decrypted. Stacktrace : System.Security.Cryptography.CryptographicException: The key {84cea658-5bcd-439a-b175-d1c4bb7956f7} was not found in the key ring. For more information go to https://aka.ms/aspnet/dataprotectionwarning at Microsoft.AspNetCore.DataProtection.KeyManagement.KeyRingBasedDataProtector.UnprotectCore(Byte[] protectedData, Boolean allowOperationsOnRevokedKeys, UnprotectStatus& status) at Microsoft.AspNetCore.DataProtection.KeyManagement.KeyRingBasedDataProtector.Unprotect(Byte[] protectedData) at Microsoft.AspNetCore.Antiforgery.DefaultAntiforgeryTokenSerializer.Deserialize(String serializedToken) --- End of inner exception stack trace --- at Microsoft.AspNetCore.Antiforgery.DefaultAntiforgeryTokenSerializer.Deserialize(String serializedToken) at Microsoft.AspNetCore.Antiforgery.DefaultAntiforgery.GetCookieTokenDoesNotThrow(HttpContext httpContext) Anyone seen this issue, or similar?

I would like to have only 1 API controller that is authenticated with a Bearer token, More or less like this implementation https://www.c-sharpcorner.com/article/jwt-token-creation-authentication-and-authorization-in-asp-net-core-6-0-with-po/ Only with the umbraco pipeline, this doesn't seem to work.

Hi, I have an Umbraco 11 site that uses Nested Content (it was originally a v8 site) and I want to update it to use the BlockList editor. The problem I have is that Nested Content is used quite extensively throughout the site for live content. I was thinking of changing my editors to BlockList, then using a SendingContentNotification handler to convert the property value in the CMS. That would be fine for content editors, and the actual value (which is still Nested Content at this point) would be updated to BlockList on the next save. But what about on the front-end, I'd have to handle both scenarios - one where the content is a BlockList, and one where the content is still in the old Nested Content format? It just doesn't feel right. Has anyone gone through this already?

I have a site running Umbraco v13 which I have upgraded from v8 via v10. I am now trying to install the latest version of Umbraco Forms - I have installed the package via Nuget and can load the Forms section in the backend, however doing so shows this error: Invalid column name 'DeleteEntries'. On checking the Installed Packages view I can see there are Pending migrations for the Umbraco Forms package, selecting the option to Run them shows a "successfully completed" message in the front-end but the console the site was run from shows the following errors: [10:35:00 INF] Create Foreign Key: ALTER TABLE [UFUserGroupFormSecurity] ADD CONSTRAINT [FK_UFUserGroupFormSecurity_UFForms_Key] FOREIGN KEY ([Form]) REFERENCES [UFForms] ([Key]) [10:35:00 ERR] Exception (9b7b8baf). Microsoft.Data.SqlClient.SqlException (0x80131904): There are no primary or candidate keys in the referenced table 'UFForms' that match the referencing column list in the foreign key 'FK_UFUserGroupFormSecurity_UFForms_Key'. Could not create constraint or index. See previous errors. Plan failed at step 7c7bc5ee-4c5b-42dc-9576-5ce6dfbddb8e Has anybody encountered this error or similar before, or has any advice on resolving it?

Hi. Docs and code says there should be an UmbracoForms folder in App_plugins. After nuget installation of Forms 13.0.1 I do not have that folder. What might be wrong here? Also the files in Views/Partials/Forms were missing. Downloaded them from docs page though. https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1206882876767997992/1206882876935634984/image.png?ex=65dda044&is=65cb2b44&hm=0314d73b87545d406bcb5592a35d82785133ac4d0ddb372d982d1290158a1e03&

Hello, we are using Umbraco Cloud with Umbraco v13 and the default External examine indexer. We have 8 different node types we are filtering on the search of the site. At some point on our Live site, Examine(the external index) stopped indexing everything and was only returning data from 1 node type. Those nodes are only updated by a Hangfire recurring Jobs. It worth to mention that our staging site, which have the same recurring jobs and almost the same data from the Live site, it is working perfectly fine, the Examine external index is returning all the expected results. Hence, after reading a bit, we decided to push the "red" Rebuild index button. After that, more content was coming up, but not all of them. Only the recently published one, like the ones updated by the Recurring jobs. And a couple of other that were "Save and Published" after the rebuild. The rest of the nodes that were published before the rebuild are not showing up. Does this rings a bell? Is there a way to force an import of the old published content? FWIW, the internal index returns all the expected data. And no errors were found on the logs related with Examine or "ExternalIndex". Als, the rebuild on the Umbraco interface was finished after about 2 minutes but on the logs you can see it took more than 20 minutes https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1296843811300970579/1296843811728916500/Screenshot_2024-10-18_at_11.33.26.png?ex=6713c36a&is=671271ea&hm=0313e1fa3de36a83cdee8d2240c86a6f4311a7e8561b59ed4606a662b909e4af&

Does anyone have any links to blog posts about how to do proper nuget versioning for packages? Is there a standard way package authors do this? I'm currently just manually updating the

PackageVersion

in my csproj when releasing a new version 🙈

I'm looking to add a single new field to the external index. This seemed like a trivial task and quite easy in v8 but all I can seem to find so far for modern Umbraco are articles about creating new indexes. TIA, tom

Using this to discuss Content Delivery API and Blazor.