Owain Jones
10/06/2023, 1:14 PMS2
)
- 1x Backoffice editing app
- 2x frontends that sit under Azure Application Gateway (WAFv2)
- 2x Azure SQL (S2
) (geo-redundant)
- 1x Storage Account for blob storage (media & crops cache)
This setup handles load very well, but is quite expensive (~ÂĢ800 a month), and whilst it makes sense for the clients that need it, it absolutely does not make sense for smaller clients.
I've seen people recommend the new Premium v3 service plan, specifically the P0v3
, which looks to be on par/maybe better than the older S2
tiers. (they're also a lot cheaper compared to S2
)
So my thinking is that these are two good options for more basic sites:
- 1x Web App (P0v3
)
- which can be manually/automatically scaled up
- (I know the backoffice / *SchedulingPublisher *server should NOT be scaled out, but scaling up *"should*" be ok?)
or
- 2x Web Apps (P0v3
)
- 1x backoffice edit app, not scaled
- 1x frontend that can be scaled up/out. (with redis cache, or similar, if scaled out)
Has anyone else used P0v3
tier web apps for Umbraco?Ambert
10/06/2023, 2:01 PMOwain Jones
10/06/2023, 4:52 PMravimotha
10/06/2023, 8:53 PMAmbert
10/06/2023, 8:56 PMruns like a train
(dutch expression, runs really good)
We used to run on a B1, but when content / visitors grew it wasnt doable anymoreravimotha
10/06/2023, 9:02 PMAmbert
10/06/2023, 9:10 PMOwain Jones
10/09/2023, 8:30 AM